AD
Home Blog Page 1326

John Boyega Says He Felt “Iffy” About Choices Made In ‘The Last Jedi’

It’s kinda crazy, but with The Rise of Skywalker, the end of the entire Skywalker Saga, just days away and people are still asking about The Last Jedi. Seriously?? Two years not enough to get away from that shit yet? Apparently not, because Hypebeast decided now is a good time to get John Boyega to pile on Rian Johnson’s divisive film, and pile on he does…

“‘The Force Awakens’ I think was the beginning of something quite solid, ‘The Last Jedi’ if I’m being honest I’d say that was feeling a bit iffy for me,” Boyega said. “I didn’t necessarily agree with a lot of the choices in that and that’s something that spoke to Mark [Hamill] a lot about and we had conversations about it. And it was hard for all of us, because we were separated.”


Oh damn, okay, John. Sounds like he and Mark Hamill bonded over their mutual dislike of the film. Boyega elaborates on his point by talking about the decision to split Finn away from his pals Rey and Poe Dameron…

“I guess the original ‘Star Wars’ films there was much more of a trio feel where it was essentially about Luke’s journey, but Han and Leia there was a strong dynamic, which I think, I don’t know how quickly we’re going to be able to establish that longterm dynamic with [‘Episode] Nine,’. But if it’s exploring that dynamic, then that would be cool. I do feel even after three films still, we don’t know them as much as we got to know Han, Luke, Leia. And maybe that’s a great opportunity to get to know them a little bit more.”


All that said, Boyega still isn’t down with those who can’t simply have criticisms of The Last Jedi, but turn the conversation toxic with hateful rhetoric…

“The rest of the fandom, even when they have problems with it, it’s discussed in a very cordial way, in a fun way. But when it gets toxic, when no one’s listening and then I say one thing and then it becomes an attack, come on man, I can tell you lot ain’t never had no real fight before. You call that an attack?”

Trust me, The Rise of Skywalker is going to bring out the worst in so-called Star Wars fans, too. Everybody has an idea how this epic story should end and chances are most of them aren’t going to get what they want.

DC Readers: Attend A Free Early Screening Of ‘Little Women’

We’re happy to offer our DC readers the chance to attend a free advance screening of Little Women, Greta Gerwig’s adaptation of the beloved novel by Louisa May Alcott. The film stars Saoirse Ronan, Emma Watson, Florence Pugh, Eliza Scanlen, Timothée Chalamet, Laura Dern, and Meryl Streep.

SYNOPSIS: Writer-director Greta Gerwig (Lady Bird) has crafted a Little Women that draws on both the classic novel and the writings of Louisa May Alcott, and unfolds as the author’s alter ego, Jo March, reflects back and forth on her fictional life. In Gerwig’s take, the beloved story of the March sisters – four young women each determined to live life on her own terms — is both timeless and timely.


The screening takes place on Wednesday, December 18th at 7:00pm at AMC Mazza Gallerie. If you’d like to attend, go to the Sony Pictures site here. Please remember all screenings are first come first served and you will need to arrive early to ensure seating. Enjoy the show!

Little Women opens on Christmas Day.

‘The Grudge’ NSFW Trailer: Andrea Riseborough And John Cho Face A Vengeful Ghost



The Grudge is by no means your typical reboot/sequel…rebootquel?  Nicolas Pesce’s supernatural horror is a continuation of the hit 2004 movie that starred Sarah Michelle Gellar, which was itself an American remake of the 2002 J-horror film Ju-On. The interesting twist is that it takes place concurrent to the 2004 movie, so how these events will bleed over could prove interesting. I mean, why add that little wrinkle and not do anything with it?

Leading the way is Andrea Riseborough, who has been on a roll lately with her performances in Mandy, Nancy, and Burden. She plays a detective who encounters a home cursed by a ghost with a serious need for revenge. The film also stars Demian Bichir,  John Cho, Betty Gilpin, Lin Shaye, and Jacki Weaver.

While Pesce has become a favorite of genre fans with films The Eyes of My Mother and Piercing, it’s producer Sam Raimi that could drive a lot of fans to look at this as more than just another reboot.

SYNOPSIS: A single mother and young detective, Muldoon (Andrea Riseborough), discovers that a suburban house is cursed by a vengeful ghost that dooms those who enter it with a violent death. Now, she runs to save herself and her son from demonic spirits from the cursed house in her neighborhood.


The Grudge opens January 3rd 2020.

‘Wonder Woman 1984’: Patty Jenkins Has “Mapped Out” Future Plans, Still Tinkering With Runtime

The future of Wonder Woman is looking pretty bright, if the enthusiastic reaction to the Wonder Woman 1984 trailer is anything to go by.  Rumors have already begun that a spinoff set in Themyscira could be next, and of course at least one more sequel with Gal Gadot’s Diana Prince. Just don’t go and set your calendar or anything just yet.

While attending last weekend’s CCXP (via Deadline), Patty Jenkins began looking forward to Wonder Woman’s future, and she says the hero’s full story is already figured out. And yep, that does include that Amazons spinoff flick, too, which she is expected to exec-produce…

“We already have it all mapped out — it’s just a matter of will we change our minds and when,” said Jenkins. “I think what we don’t want to do is do it back to back. It’s been great doing these two movies back to back, but I think it’s important to give it a little rest in between — and I like doing other things in between.”

Jenkins added,  “And Gal has other things to do. I never want to make decisions too far in advance. We have to see if we both feel like making the movie we think we want to make when the moment comes.”


Sticking with the here and now, Jenkins also revealed (via THR) that Wonder Woman 1984 is basically finished due to a months-long release date delay. But Jenkins can’t help herself and is fiddling with the movie’s runtime, which began with a 2hr and 45minute cut…


“I have an idea and I’m like, maybe it would make [the movie] shorter,” said Jenkins. “We’re not going to officially say [how long the movie is] yet, however it’s in a good territory.”


As for why the movie has stretched so long, Jenkins has a very good reason. Sometimes the scenes were turning out so well, they just had to keep expanding on them…

“It was interesting that so many scenes that we set out to shoot, then something great would happen and then we would expand upon it and definitely with the action, what some things that were written to be very small little moments turned into, ‘But that’s so awesome.’ It’s hard when you end up with that situation.”


At this point, coming off the 181-minute Avengers: Endgame, 165-minutes doesn’t sound so bad.

Wonder Woman 1984 opens June 5th 2020.




Review: ‘Richard Jewell’, Clint Eastwood Goes On The Attack To Defend A Tragic Hero

The name Richard Jewell shouldn’t be famous. If the tragic events of July 27th 1996 hadn’t have happened, it wouldn’t be. He was a normal guy; an overweight security guard with a spotty job history and a pleasant but forgettable demeanor. Jewell would probably be considered a doormat by some folks for being too nice. But those events of July 27th 1996 did happen; a terrorist did set off an improvised bomb at the Summer Olympics in Atlanta; and Jewell was the one who first discovered it. If that were all there was to it, Jewell would be remembered as a momentary hero, someone who was at the right place at the right time. But it’s what happened after that which has cemented Jewell’s name, and given Clint Eastwood a provocative story to rally around.

While Eastwood’s grizzled, keep off my lawn/don’t tread on me perspective has only become more prominent over the years, it has never been as distinct as in Richard Jewell. Corrupt government officials in the FBI and a venomous news media lurk in the shadows, ready to unleash a power-mad scheme to destroy common, every day Joe Blow. To be fair, Eastwood has plenty to go on to make that kind of assertion, which is why this feels like the most invested he’s been behind the camera.

Jewell, played by I, Tonya and BlackKklansman goof Paul Walter Hauser, is first seen as a congenial office clerk. That’s where he met aggressive attorney Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell), and kept his stash of Snickers bars stocked, and occasionally joined him for video games at the nearby arcade. But Jewell has aspirations of getting into law enforcement, but they’re scary aspirations. He eventually gets his wish, but stints as a cop, then a campus security guard, are cut short by his overzealous nature. It’s the kind of undisciplined zeal and need to command authority that, under the wrong temperament, turns men like George Zimmerman into killers of the innocent. But Jewell isn’t violent, it doesn’t seem to be in his nature at all. He is by all accounts a good person just trying to do the right thing, albeit the wrong way.

That makes him both the most perfect and most imperfect person to find that bomb on July 27th in Olympic Park. The police officers don’t even believe him at first, seeing Jewell as just some chubby wannabe cop. But when forced to accept that he’s not making it up, it’s only moments later the explosion occurs. The injuries were vast, but it would’ve been much worse if Jewell hadn’t began warning people to get away. He became an instant celebrity, risen to the status of hero by a media which needed something good to come out of this horrible tragedy. And then they turned on him.

Eastwood captures the rapidity of Jewell’s fall from grace; so quick the sleepy-eyed Jewell doesn’t even see it happening. Within days he’s gone from hero to terrorist, throwing his life, and that of his concerned mother Bobi (Kathy Bates, terrific) into upheaval. It’s quick enough to make your head spin, but comes at the price of a wildly unflattering portrayal of journalist Kathy Scruggs (Olivia Wilde), who destroys Jewell with a single headline. A man-eater it is suggested who uses sex to get the big stories, Scruggs is painted as the ugliest of female stereotypes and nothing is done to contradict that. Something tells me if Scruggs were still around she’d be filing the kind of defamation suit that Jewell filed against her outlet, of which she was eventually exonerated. Jon Hamm plays FBI agent Tom Parker who, after succumbing to Scruggs’ charms, then goes on a crusade to crucify Jewell. Between Parker and Scruggs, the constant humiliation of Jewell in the news media is constant, and Hauser’s sympathetic performance has you wanting the guy to get a win.

That said, Eastwood and screenwriter Billy Ray do a better job rounding out Jewell as a real person than they do his one-note enemies. Jewell is often his own worst enemy. His reverence for law enforcement has him giving in to pretty much anything they ask, much to the chagrin of Bryant, who agrees to become Jewell’s attorney. Bryant’s frustration bubbles over more than once at Jewell’s casual treatment towards the people trying to send him to Death Row. Jewell just wants so badly to be a cop that he’s afraid of going against them. It also doesn’t help that Jewell fits a certain kind of profile; a frustrated white guy obsessed with law enforcement, with need to be the center of attention. Oh, and he owns dozens of guns. “It’s Georgia”, is the only defense he can mount to the flabbergasted Bryant, who understands all too well that perception is often reality. Bryant, a perfect stand-in for Eastwood himself, has an office with a poster boasting “I fear government more than I fear terrorism.” Even his assistant, a Russian woman (played by Nina Arianda), says “Where I come from, when the government says someone’s guilty, that’s how you know they’re innocent.” One can imagine Eastwood chuckling to an empty chair over that one.

What emerges is a strange coming-of-age drama in which Jewell learns to remove the rose-colored glasses and look at the world with more skepticism. The actual merits of the FBI investigation aren’t explored with any real depth, perhaps because it makes sense for Hauser to be a cursory subject as the person who found the bomb, the same way spouses are investigated when the other dies suspiciously. The driving force of Richard Jewell is Eastwood himself, who relishes his working-class hero (these characters are a constant for him) and longs to give the man his due. He puts Jewell bravely in the heart of the action during the bombing scene; while others are partying or loafing around. It’s a few minutes of terrific tension, and we forget how good Eastwood can be at scenes like this, while employing his no-frills style to maximum effect. The minimalism of it actually helps in capturing the gravity of the situation, and Jewell emerges as the protector he always saw himself as. Richard Jewell may go way overboard in criticizing forces Eastwood has little respect for, but it does much to honor Jewell’s simple heroism, and hopefully will inspire that in the rest of us.

3 out of 5

Review: The Slow Burning Genesis Of ‘Portrait Of A Lady On Fire’

In a world where Marvel movies aren’t cinema and Hollywood politics often plague the ones that are considered to be, foreign films can be a refreshing change of pace for a viewer. This couldn’t be truer for the French period romance film Portrait of a Lady on Fire. Written and directed by the internationally acclaimed French filmmaker Céline Sciamma, the film succeeds in telling a love story for the ages with a modern sensibility sprinkled throughout. 

Told in flashback, we first meet the painter Marianne (Noémie Merlant) bobbing about on the sea, being taken to a seaside estate where she is about to paint the manor’s young mistress, where is to paint Héloïse (Adele Haenel) as a present to a possible suitor. Héloïse is quite against the match, feeling a lack of control over her own future, and has refused to be painted. Marianne must gain her trust and paint her without her knowledge. As time passes, the two women grow closer, bonding over Vivaldi and feeling trapped in late eighteenth-century gender norms. As trust builds, love blooms, making Marianne’s job harder as the lines between work and duty are blurred, with Marianne wanting to show her work. Once the betrayal is known, Héloïse agrees to pose for the painter, throwing them even closer together and into the unsaid struggle between societal expectations and natural human desire.


Like a true French filmmaker, Sciamma doesn’t rely on dialogue to tell her story, instead using visuals to portray characterization and development to hold our attention. Mastering elements of mise en scene, like center framing, symmetry, and natural light, the piece is filled with meaningful imagery and messages often missing from modern mainstream cinema. Brilliant painting-like frames pop up from time to time, creating a breadcrumb trail of visual treats for the viewer. For some reason, the longing between the two women seems to be amplified by the sparse and vast landscape, an obvious metaphor for them being extremely beautiful and desirable yet lonely. Steadily paced, the film takes its time, relishing in the silence and the process of Marianne’s work. This builds tension rather than boredom, showing Sciamma as the master craftsman she is. Sciamma knows how to bring use filmmaking to bring out the performances in her actors, the chemistry between Merlant and Haenal palpable and captivating. 
Winner of the best screenplay award and the Queer Palm award at the Cannes Film Festival, the film delves deep into modern issues plaguing women, from sexuality to abortion, against a period piece background. The main cast is entirely female and this representation is continued behind the scenes with mainly female department heads, including artist Hélène Delmaire, who painted around 16 hours a day on set to match the paintings with the film’s blocking. The result is a well-crafted film, clearly made by dedicated professionals who just so happen to be women. 
Visually stunning and narratively heartbreaking, Portrait of a Lady on Fire and Célina Sciamma brings us one of the most moving films of the year and one of the most breathtaking romances of the decade. Destined to be nominated in the Foreign Language Category, this slow-burning diamond in the rough is worth settling into for two hours. 
  
4.5 out of 5 

‘Like A Boss’ NSFW Trailer: Business Is About To Pick Up For Rose Byrne And Tiffany Haddish

Individually, Tiffany Haddish, Rose Byrne, and Salma Hayek are all very funny. Together, they should make for a hilarious trio well worth the price of admission, or at least that’s what the new NSFW trailer for Like A Boss hopes to convince you of. I’m not sold.

Directed by Miguel Arteta, Like A Boss stars Byrne and Haddish as business partners in a failing cosmetics company, only for Hayek’s powerful industry titan to swoop in with an offer they can’t refuse.

Maybe it’s the stale comedic idea that successful women must always be at one another’s throats, but something about this feels very outdated. Well, except for Billy Porter who is probably going to steal all of this thing.  The rest of the cast includes Ari Graynor, Jennifer Coolidge, Natasha Rothwell, Jessica St. Clair and Karan Soni.

SYNOPSIS: Best friends Mia and Mel (Tiffany Haddish and Rose Byrne) are living their best lives running their own cosmetics company they’ve built from the ground up. Unfortunately, they’re in over their heads financially, and the prospect of a big buyout offer from a notorious titan of the cosmetics industry Claire Luna (Salma Hayek) proves too tempting to pass up, putting Mel and Mia’s lifelong friendship in jeopardy. The beauty business is about to get ugly.

Like A Boss opens January 10th 2020.

‘The Rise Of Skywalker’: JJ Abrams On Whether Bloodlines Matter To Gaining Force Powers

One of my favorite themes across Rian Johnson’s The Last Jedi, seen in both Rey (Daisy Ridley) and the young orphan Temiri Blagg, is that anybody can wield the powers of the Force. It’s an integral message, one that expands on the Star Wars mythos which George Lucas kept very isolated for far too long. With JJ Abrams returning for The Rise of Skywalker, it’s possible he could overturn that idea and keep those with Force abilities limited to very specific bloodlines. Fortunately, Abrams has no plans to do that.

The info comes from a Twitter user who translated portions of a Premiere Magazine interview with Abrams, in which he says that bloodlines don’t matter whether someone can gain Force powers…

“Yes, of course keeping that message has been a priority. It is an absolute mistake to say that you have to be related to a particular person or blood line to have power with the Force. Since I was a child, one of the most moving things for me was to know what anyone could be a Jedi.”


I hope this is accurate because it’s one of the main things I’ve been worried about Abrams overthrowing as he takes over from Johnson.  Hopefully, his statement applies to Rey, as well, in keeping her lineage as distant as possible. She doesn’t need to be related to the Skywalkers, or Palpatine, or any of the major Star Wars figures to still be someone of prominence.

I guess we’ll find out what Abrams has planned when The Rise of Skywalker opens on December 20th!


Disney+ Shows Are First Time TV And MCU Will Interlink, According To Kevin Feige

Somebody call the Agents of SHIELD, but apparently, they aren’t really part of the MCU.  That’s all I’m taking from Kevin Feige’s recent comments out of CCXP about the expansion of the Marvel Cinematic Universe to include Disney+ shows such as Hawkeye, Falcon and the Winter Soldier, and WandaVision.

Feige said, “After ‘Endgame,’ thinking, ‘What can we do next?’Disney+ is going to give us this opportunity to tell even deeper stories with characters you already know and love…in a new type of cinematic way that we haven’t done before. We’ve already started shooting two of them and they’re very, very special.”

He then added, “And it all, for the first time, will interlink. So, the MCU will be on your TV screen at home on Disney+ and interconnect with the movies and go back and forth. It’s exciting to expand the MCU into even bigger and better heights.”


Oh yeah? That’s weird. Because I remember Agents of SHIELD springing out of the massive success of 2012’s The Avengers, then later crossing over with Thor: The Dark World and Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Furthermore, Netflix’s Marvel programs referenced MCU events, as well.

All of this was one-sided, of course, and that’s probably Feige’s point. The movies have never acknowledged what Marvel TV was doing, and now that he’s in charge that will change.  I just feel like this comment will encourage people not to watch the final seasons of Runaways and Agents of SHIELD, which would be a shame. [Omelete]

‘Swallow’ Trailer: Haley Bennett Develops The Oddest Food Disorder

I’ve been a big fan of Haley Bennett’s since her starring role in Gregg Araki’s Kaboom, and since then she has gone on to give a number of impressive performances in The Girl On the Train, The Equalizer, The Red Sea Diving Resort, and more. But it was in the Tribeca-debuting film Swallow where Bennett (a dead-ringer for a young Cate Blanchett) has received some of the best reviews of her career, and now we can see a little of it for ourselves.

You know how pregnant women sometimes get the oddest food cravings? Well, Swallow is sorta like that, only Bennett plays a pregnant woman who suddenly develops a case of pica, which is a disorder that causes cravings to eat inedible objects. Yeah, it’s a real thing. The film is written and directed by first-timer Carlo Mirabella-Davis. Austin Stowell, Elizabeth Marvel, David Rasche, Lauren Velez, and Denis O’Hare o-star.

SYNOPSIS: Pregnant housewife Hunter (Haley Bennett) suddenly develops a case of pica—a psychological disorder involving the desire to consume inedible objects. The more her husband and his family try to stop her compulsions, the gruesomely deeper she falls into this harmful obsession until her perfect home becomes a patriarchal prison.


Swallow opens on March 13th 2020.